|
One of the primary tasks that we
assist our corporate clients and their shareholders with is that of
determining the best alternatives to extracting profits from the
corporation.
The most important consideration in
deciding the optimum mix of salaries and dividends for shareholders is
their cash-flow requirements. To achieve this, the objective is to meet
this after-tax cash flow requirement yet retain as much as possible
within the corporation for reinvestment. We consider, among other
things, the annual small business limit, which is presently $400,000 of
active business income that is taxed at approximately 19%, as well as
RRSP limits, CPP limits and other issues such as child-care expenses and
moving expenses, which are limited to the extent of employment income.
Until now, a very common strategy has been to bonus out corporate income
in excess of the small business limit. For example if a particular
corporation has generated $700,000 in active profits, and the annual
business limit is $400,000, then this strategy would call for a year-end
bonus accrual of $300,000. This kind of strategy was thought ideal as
it allowed the after-tax surplus that was created from the $400,000
component to be extracted with no penalty, as the dividend gross-up and
tax-credit system provided almost perfect integration between the
corporate and personal tax systems.
25% Gross-Up and
Tax Credit
The current system requires that
for every $100 in dividends that are received, $125 must be included in
taxable income. When the tax is calculated on the taxable income, a
dividend tax credit of 16 2/3% of the amount of the dividends that are
received is allowed against the Federal tax, which is a determining
factor in the calculation of Provincial tax. This procedure essentially
puts shareholders in the same position as if they earned the same
business income personally.
This framework works well when the
corporate tax rate is below 20%. There would be a significant penalty
if a higher corporate tax rate were to apply as a dividend gross-up and
the tax credit system assumed only a 20% rate of tax. In Ontario, a
corporation that is earning active business income will face a tax rate
of 19% on income up to $400,000 and 44% thereafter. That is the reason
why we almost, without question, will bonus corporate income below the
annual business limit.
Beginning in 2006, a second type of
dividend gross-up and tax credit system was introduced, which applies to
income that is taxed at the general rate of what would otherwise apply
to corporate income beyond the $400,000 annual business limit. The
gross-up portion is 45% and the tax credit portion against federal tax
is 27.5% of the dividend received.
This new system assumes an
underlying corporate tax rate of 31% instead of the 20% that is assumed
in the 25% gross-up and tax-credit system. Thereby allowing us to now
consider retaining more surplus that is taxed at corporate rates and
foregoing a bonus accrual.
However, there is still a tax cost
to relying on the new gross-up and tax-credit system, but it is
significantly reduced from the previous system that would otherwise
apply. On a per $1,000 of corporate income analysis, the absolute tax
cost has been reduced from about $110 to about $39. Our analysis is
that if you were to deploy surplus that is created by this regime, you
would break even after about eight years.
Specifically, if you generate a
reasonable return on the corporate funds that are available, in excess
of a reinvested bonus, the sufficient after-tax surplus would be
generated in eight years to offset the previously mentioned $39 tax
cost. This is an improvement over the previous system that required 22
years.
Other Issues
Large bonuses attract Employers’
Health Tax (EHT) in Ontario, whereas dividends do not. A large bonus
could also alter the frequency of your withholding time requirement as
the average monthly remittance could now exceed thresholds that could
cause a corporation to pay withholding taxes twice monthly and even as
much as four times monthly. Also, the due date for corporations’ taxes
would be pushed forward one month as the three-month allowance is only
available to corporations with income below the annual business limit.
We are not necessarily saying that this new regime is a sea-change in
the realm of shareholders’ remuneration, as we believe year-end bonus
accruals will still be significant. However, this new system should
require us to re-evaluate those situations that are affected by these
provisions.
|